Possibly untrue science news

The gunk in that bottle reminds me of an Alfred Hitchcock episode, The Jar.

6 Likes

Somehow reminds me of


Probably tastes better, though.

5 Likes

Imagine being the lab assistant who had to monitor that before the webcams…

6 Likes

09/21/1932, 3:26 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:27 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:28 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:29 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:30 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:31 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:32 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:33 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:34 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:35 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:36 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:37 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:38 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:39 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:40 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:41 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:42 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:43 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:44 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:45 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:46 a.m.: Drop still hanging.
09/21/1932, 3:47 a.m.: Drop fell when I was in bathroom.

14 Likes

Yes. Possibly, but not probably.

1 Like

And somewhat related:

6 Likes

Wasn’t the Cauchy distribution invented to spite someone who said certain properties were unique to the normal distribution?

2 Likes

This nutrition studies stuff makes me especially angry, because people follow the unsubstantiated guidelines and then blame themselves when it doesn’t help them/makes them sick.

It’s not just statistical fussing; real medical harm is being done.

14 Likes

And it just confuses the whole issue of trying to find and disseminate real methods for good nutrition.

7 Likes

That’s the thing. What’s been coming out in the past 5 years or so is there are staggeringly few actual good studies on nutrition. And the ones that are have been buried because they didn’t conform to the prevailing theory.

9 Likes

I think there are just far too many variables to reliably determine what is ‘good nutrition’ for anyone, let alone everyone. The older I get, the more it seems like astrology, phrenology, or alchemy. Even a very careful scientific study of one specific thing done in careful isolation and unchanging circumstances isn’t necessarily applicable in the real world where things aren’t isolated or controlled and are constantly changing.

6 Likes

I agree. Most of the easy ones have been figured out (beri-beri, scurvy, goiter, etc.), and we’re left with the hard ones.

7 Likes

not the punk band, unfortunately

2 Likes

This is exactly what those ads are doing, and to top it off, it isn’t even accurate. But because there are no apparent medical implications, they can get away with it.

Buyer beware.

11 Likes

I don’t doubt that they’ve found another dwarf planet in the outer reaches of the solar system; it’s extraordinarily unlikely that more such objects wouldn’t exist. I am, however, skeptical of any suggestion that we’re missing anything Earth-sized or larger out there.

7 Likes

Depends. When the aphelions get out to 1,000-2,000 AU, missing a planet in the Oort cloud, even a relatively large one, becomes understandable. This dwarf is in relatively close (80 AU) at the moment.

6 Likes

Let me generalize a bit further. I’m skeptical of any scientific claim that can’t easily be either verified or falsified.

“There are large objects in our solar system that we haven’t found yet” is easily, and repeatedly, being verified.

“There is a specific object in our solar system that we haven’t found yet” is much more difficult to either verify or falsify, especially when they start throwing in distances in the hundreds or thousands of AU, and orbital periods in the tens or hundreds of thousands of years.

3 Likes

Yeah, true. In this case, they’re looking at orbital mechanics. Each planet they find that looks like it might be part of a group being shepherded by a larger planet makes it more likely that we will find a large planet doing the job. I’m not going to call it a dead cinch certainty, and Nine is still controversial, but…

(Wrong description earlier, should be “Sednoid” as it’s in too close for the Oort cloud, and too far for the Kuiper belt.)

6 Likes

Besides, we already have a ninth planet.

#Pluto4Ever

6 Likes

There you go, see? Nine is already controversial from the start. :stuck_out_tongue:

3 Likes