Possibly untrue science news

Cryptocurrency mining uses significant amounts of energy as part of the proof-of-work time-stamping scheme to add new blocks to the chain. Expanding upon previously calculated energy use patterns for mining four prominent cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Monero), we estimate the per coin economic damages of air pollution emissions and associated human mortality and climate impacts of mining these cryptocurrencies in the US and China. Results indicate that in 2018, each $1 of Bitcoin value created was responsible for $0.49 in health and climate damages in the US and $0.37 in China. The similar value in China relative to the US occurs despite the extremely large disparity between the value of a statistical life estimate for the US relative to that of China. Further, with each cryptocurrency, the rising electricity requirements to produce a single coin can lead to an almost inevitable cliff of negative net social benefits, absent perpetual price increases. For example, in December 2018, our results illustrate a case (for Bitcoin) where the health and climate change “cryptodamages” roughly match each $1 of coin value created. We close with discussion of policy implications.

Obviously, the solution is to tax cyrptocoins.

4 Likes

Bitcoin is straight out of Orwell, a way to destroy surplus resources just because we can

9 Likes

So that’s what built the martian pyramids, canals, and face!

7 Likes

image
Jesus says “Holy Shit!”

6 Likes

a professor emeritus of entomology is opining about something only loosely related to his field?

Oh dear…

6 Likes

http://www.enterprisemission.com/

1 Like

The great thing is, the first story I saw about it was on a FOX news page.

…I didn’t click, didn’t want my feed sending me more of that.

3 Likes

Richard Hoagland. :roll_eyes:

I guess that prof is a xenoentomologist.*

*self-appointed

4 Likes

He’s an expert on insects-- it’s his field-- and how many other people can even claim to be experts on Martian insects?

I’m puzzled how they would even get to Mars, or breathe there. It’s much more likely that they convergently evolved to look like insects.

… And that is still mightily unlikely.

3 Likes

I can foresee a future in which the interference is precisely the point.

7 Likes

Clearly, the solution is to move the telescopes beyond the orbits of the satellites. :nerd_face: :exploding_head:

To the 12,000 satellites already planned, SpaceX may add a further 30,000. Other companies, such as Amazon, OneWeb and Samsung, are interested in launching their own constellations.

In a more perfect world, we would tax the everloving shit out of (or otherwise prevent corporations from externalizing the true costs of their business models) such commercial satellites and use the revenue to fund space-based telescopes.

Astronomers et. al. get to leapfrog not only those noisy satellites, but that pesky atmosphere, as well. Telescope construction, combined with the increased volume of TelCo satellite launches, proves to be the impetus for a sort of space-based remix of the industrial revolution. New frontiers are opened for humankind, as we take to the skies (or at least near-earth orbit). Everyone wins.

It could happen. :wink:

3 Likes

Tax Musk for it.

Seriously, this piece of garbage needs to be shoved off all boards of direction, sued into oblivion, and sent to a TED talk upstate.

3 Likes

The nuclear war that finished off anthroposaur society explains the evidence for global wildfires, the bits of stressed quartz and the tektites interpreted by others as evidence for asteroid impact.

and of course there’s the fact (I use the term loosely) that H. P. Lovecraft had a telepathic connection with anthroposaurs, and that this explains his references to the Old Ones, the fallen city of R’lyeh, his loathing of immigrants, desertion of his attractive wife, and poekilothermic physiology. Err, yup.

One of the less extreme proposals was written up in this novel:

https://www.amazon.com/Toolmaker-Koan-John-McLoughlin/

Haven’t read it.

1 Like

Unsurprisingly, not everybody in the scientific community agreed with Romoser’s fringe claims. Biology professor at Oregon State University David Maddison told Space.com that Romoser is seeing things, pointing out that it may be an example of pareidolia, the phenomenon that leads people to see patterns in random stimuli.

“I, personally, have pareidolia with respect to insects, beetles in particular,” Maddison told Space.com . “I’ve worked on beetles for decades; I have collected many thousands of beetles around the world. Through the years I have built into my brain a pattern-recognition system for picking out beetles.”

7 Likes

“The best thing you could do for the Amazon,” the Brazilian scientist Eneas Salati has said, “is to bomb all the roads.”

5 Likes

Not that they’re suggesting any particular action, mind you, but look at how much could be achieved by that one rebellious act.

They need to ‘suggest’ the best ways to do it without causing any more environmental damage than possible.

4 Likes
5 Likes

Did somebody say

Black Hole?

7 Likes

Couldn’t a couple of star-sized black holes coalesce? Or do gravity waves radiate all the excess mass? At least according to existing models of star evolution.

6 Likes

I haven’t done the digging into the article or references, so I’m talking out of my rear here, but… one of the larger issues then might be that you need to account for more than one large black hole forming closely enough together to then spiral in and merge within the available time?

4 Likes