No more Korean Boy Bands, Anime, or Tacos at school.
13 Likes
13 Likes
12 Likes
Only a ginger can call another ginger “ginger”.
8 Likes
But more seriously, they’re trying to eliminate all action against discrimination, and (because fascists live in backwards land) they’re doing it saying that anti-discrimination efforts are discriminatory. And by “eliminate”, I mean not just to stop doing it, but to scrub all information about it, all research, all documentation, all history. They’re working on not just undoing but unexisting the Disability Rights movement, the LGBTQI+ rights movement, the Civil Rights movement, and the Women’s Liberation movement.
They are re-imposing segregation, on the basis that desegregation is racist. They are removing women from the workplace and public participation on the basis that gender equity is sexist. They’re going to remove all accommodations for disabled people because it’s impractical and just plain common sense.
They’re making exclusion, humiliation, and shame core to public policy.
I’m pretty sure they don’t mean to include prejudice against redheads and the left-handed in that, but they’re not going to weep about it.
16 Likes
Archive link so that you don’t have to sign up for spam to read the article:
10 Likes
Towards the end they discuss the role of University presidents and how they used to be expected to speak out in favor of the university being a key institution of democracy, and how now, they’re expected to talk about self-preservation… honestly, the post-great recession put them in that position. It probably go deeper than that, too. The far right has been attacking “woke” universities for a while, and as the funding for colleges has dried up and/or been privatized, they’ve already been trained to think of themselves as acting like a university is a business. I think this probably cuts across the “private-public” distinctions, as the major private unis need to think about their endowments and growing it, while public universities, are seeing the need to push up tuition costs at a time when fewer students can afford to pay it (forcing them to go deep into debt just to get a BA). That led to freezes on new lines for tenured profs, in favor of more adjuncts or more grad students teaching. Over worked adjuncts or inexperienced grad students are less able to give students the education they deserve. So, this made colleges and universities easy pickings for this movement to come along and gut them more easily.
9 Likes
Three days ago, the New York Post reported that Hunter College was looking to hire a scholar in Palestinian Studies. The job ad read: “We seek a historically grounded scholar who takes a critical lens to issues pertaining to Palestine including but not limited to: settler colonialism, genocide, human rights, apartheid, migration, climate and infrastructure devastation, health, race, gender, and sexuality.”
It took less than a New York minute for Governor Hochul to order the job listing taken down and for CUNY leaders to comply. According to Hochul’s office, “Hateful rhetoric of any kind has no place at CUNY or anywhere in New York State.” The hateful rhetoric in question? These words and phrases: “settler colonialism,” “genocide,” and “apartheid.”
If this a person studying these historical phenomenon cannot be hired at CUNY, if a job advertisement mentioning these historical phenomenon cannot be posted at CUNY, it’s safe to say that it probably won’t be long before any course examining these phenomenon cannot be taught at CUNY.
Let’s be crystal clear about what this means. First, any Palestinian voices and history mentioning these phenomenon will be taken out of the curriculum. Second, any anti-Zionist Jewish voices and history mentioning these phenomenon will be taken out of the curriculum. But, third, it also means that any Jewish Zionist or pro-Israel voices and history that mention these phenomenon will also be taken out of the curriculum.
Let me give you a concrete example.
My wife’s grandparents were refugees from Nazi Germany who fled to the United States in the 1930s. After they died, my wife went through the trove of Judaica they had kept in their possession, some of which my wife now has. One book in our library now stands out: An original edition of A Palestine Picture Book, published by Schocken in 1947, featuring photographs by Jakob Rosner for the Jewish National Fund.
The book has stunning photographs of Palestine, pre-1947.
It also has stunning text. Here are some example:
"It is barely forty years since the large-scale Jewish colonization of Palestine was begun. Despite natural and political handicaps, Jewish colonization, once begun, continued.”
“Long a barren waste, it has been transformed by Jewish settlers into a place of fertile fields and green gardens in a generation’s time.”
“Orange plantations now cover thousands of acres of the once water-starved coastal plain in dramatic contrast with the parched tracts of soil where colonization has not yet begun.”
“From Lake Chinnereth the Jordan flows through a wide valley studded with new and thriving Jewish settlements.”
“They have devoted their life and labor to the one aim of developing their settlements into strong and efficient units. Many of the new agricultural colonies are either.”
“…and landscaped prospects of the permanent settlement….All collective settlements…The fully developed settlements…the collective settlements…Some settlements…especially settlements…A number of settlements…brought upon a settlement…fathers and mothers of the young settlers, left Europe to join the settlements…When a settlement is founded…in every settlement…reproduces the work of the settlement…”
Virtually every page is a reference to colonies, colonists, settlers, and settlements. Put the words together, and what do you get? A concept and a text, written by Jews, that Governor Hochul, the leaders of CUNY, and the leaders of Hunter College have decided is hateful rhetoric that has no place at CUNY.
Please grasp the irony: In the name of protecting Jews against anti-Semitism, we have the governor of New York and the chancellor of CUNY, neither of whom is Jewish, prohibiting the teaching of a text, written by Jews, published by Jews, featuring photographs taken by Jews for the Jewish National Fund, owned by my wife’s Jewish refugee grandparents, now owned by my Jewish wife.
The words censorship and academic freedom and McCarthyism and authoritarianism don’t even begin to describe the reality of what is happening here: Jewish texts banned by non-Jews in the name of the Jews. It’s like a fable out of Kafka or a short story by Babel or a novella by Roth. I’d suggest we adopt one of those readings instead, but maybe it won’t be too long before they are banned, too.
14 Likes
Good to see that suppressing academic freedom is an issue that has bipartisan consensus in the US.
8 Likes
Where is my Angry emoji!
9 Likes
The Department of Education launched a first-of-its-kind website, “EndDEI.Ed.Gov,” just hours before a deadline warning institutions to end discrimination or they will be subject to federal funding consequences.
It would be a damn shame if this was flooded with spam and bullshit, now would it not?
12 Likes
It may be fixed by now, but I saw that you could upload hundred of MBs as an attachment. Shame if they ran out of drive space.
14 Likes
12 Likes
15 Likes
Fuck him, fuck this administration, fuck this timeline. GAAAAAHHHH!!!
17 Likes
So much respect for the constitution and the bill of rights!!! /s 
12 Likes
7 Likes
This is really bad and the Texas Legislature is gearing up to give away our tax money to schools like this.
Over the last three years, the head of a small charter school network that serves fewer than 1,000 students has taken home up to $870,000 annually
. . .
Board members have voted to increase Cavazos’ pay or other financial benefits in 14 of their 24 meetings since 2021.
In one instance, the board granted Cavazos a bonus of $20,000 after taxes for every month that he continued to work for the district. The increase, described as a “retention incentive,” bolstered his take-home pay by an additional $240,000 annually.
. . .
Board members defended their decision to dole out repeated bonuses to Cavazos, including payments totaling roughly half a million dollars to fully reimburse a withdrawal he made from his retirement fund in 2018 for a “personal emergency.”
What kind of “personal emergency” costs $500,000 and why doesn’t a man making over $870,000 a year not have his own damned money to pay for it?
They even pay for his car.
12 Likes