That guy has been off the rails since he beginning, he was the guy that said Bernie Sanders was falsifying his Civil Rights activism.
Published in the Washington Post, though. He has the approval of the donor class.
You’ll find plenty worse on Twitter. Search “Bernie” on any day and you’ll find bucketfuls of stuff like this:
That sounds contradictory. Or, at least, necessarily discontinuous.
A top-down approach to getting rid of the old order, but a bottom-up approach to constructing the new one, only beginning after the old order is gone?
It seems more efficient, less destructive, and more humanitarian to have the new order consuming and replacing the old order from within, like a tree being consumed from within. That way, when you topple the leadership, you don’t have the collateral damage from the entire tree coming down at once.
What makes you think she’s planning a top-down beginning?
Nina’s not a “defeat Trump” person, she’s more of a “dismantle the American empire” sort. And that requires a bottom-up revolution.
Because that’s pretty much what she said?
“Don’t ask me what the new order should be until the old order’s gone.” (Paraphrased)
You can’t really topple the old order from the bottom up unless you’re replacing it at the same time, and you can’t do that unless you know what you’re replacing it with.
Oh, I know. I wasn’t distancing him from the Democrats, the dude was literally married to his husband by Eric Holder.He’s just been foaming at the mouth about Bernie since day 1.
I have a very low opinion of pretty much all editorials currently - particularly US politics ones. But this guy might be among the lowest of the low.
Ok, I know it’s all bullshit but Trump’s criticism is specifically that Obama didn’t war enough and Dean is saying Trump was hands off with world leaders - that makes it sound like Dean was saying if Trump was more aggressive with diplomacy (which nearly universally means heavy economic sanctions, which is its own set of problems aside from military action) Assad wouldn’t have released chemical weapon attacks. That’s the other non-humanitarian solution to a problem; make a poor country poorer and remove the civilians from access to basic needs.
Thread:
Thread: