As @Melizmatic is wont to say, unfuck Bobby Kotick.
late stage capitalismâŚ
I wonder if my two friends who work(ed) there, who I more or lost lost touch with since quitting Facebook, still have their jobs. And how they feel about them if they do.
A few years ago I had an offer, really more of a strong invitation to apply, but my spouse didnât want to move to California and I didnât think the salary they were offering made up for the greatly increased housing costs. Then I got out of the industry entirely. Still not in a union, but also getting screwed over a lot less.
I imagine subscriptions to WoW are way down from the heyday. Anyone who was working in that department should have known that they were on borrowed time.
iâve subscribed for over 10 years, and i am not going to unsub because of this. itâs not fair to the employees to do that â after all, i still enjoy the games they make. but it sure sucks. i hope they unionize.
Headline burn:
According to the beverage industry trade outlet Just Drinks, âPepsiCo announced its annual results, which showed a 1.8% increase in revenues to $64.6bn and organic growth of 3.7%. Net profit surged to $12.6bn from $4.9bn. The company is predicting organic growth of 4% for the new financial year.â
Thatâs about a 158 percent increase in annual profit. So why is PepsiCo automating if itâs already immensely profitable? The simple answer is: because it can.
Layoffs are no longer a sign of a companyâs failure, theyâre an inherent failure mode of capitalism.
Theyâre trying to make as much as they can now because they know that their revenues are all going to dry up soon, when no one is able to afford to buy a can of pepsi anymore.
Employing people was never a goal of Capitalism. It was just a necessary evil so the owners could profit. Now that automation is on the horizon, expect major layoffs on all industries. Even retail is getting hit, hard.
plus donât forget that the companies and 1% will fight against UBI since that will take money from them. They would rather burn it all down and sit in the ashes than try to make the system work long term.
If âpeople should have to work to eatâ were really a thing like capitalists claim, the following things wouldnât exist:
- inheritance
- investment income
- property income (i.e. rent)
- royalties
- licensing fees
As it is, it turns out that they think that only people who donât have enough wealth to survive off of any of the above should have to work to eat.