effective messaging
Scumbags are already feeling the heat as the chickens come home to roost:
Republicans in Congress have responded to President Trumpās unilateral moves to freeze federal spending, dismantle programs and fire civil servants with a collective shrug, staying mostly silent and even praising him as he circumvents the legislative branch.
But in recent days, as his slash-and-burn campaign to remake the government has begun to affect their states and districts, some Republicans have tried to push back in subtle ways. They have sought carve outs and special consideration for agriculture programs, scientific research and more, even as they cheered on Mr. Trumpās overall approach.
Their swift and quiet moves to protect their own pieces of the federal spending pie without critiquing Mr. Trump are an early indication of the political realities that could pose obstacles to the presidentās push. Many programs he has targeted for cost-cutting have entrenched constituencies in Congress built up by Republicans over many years. It is one reason that shrinking the size of the federal government will be a mammoth task, despite the G.O.P.ās posture of maximum deference to Mr. Trump.
Senator Katie Britt was one of the first Republicans to raise concerns at home soon after the Trump administration directed the National Institutes of Health to slash $4 billion in overhead costs for medical research grantees, a move that has since been paused by a federal judge. Ms. Britt, whose state has received more than $518 million in N.I.H. grants for projects currently active there, told a local news outlet that she would press administration officials to take a āsmart, targeted approachā to cuts so as to ānot hinder lifesaving, groundbreaking research at high-achieving institutionsā such as the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
In the House, a group of Republicans from farm states and districts introduced legislation this week that aims to salvage a foreign aid program targeted for extinction by Mr. Trump as part of his effort to wipe out the U.S. Agency for International Development.
The bill would transfer oversight of the Food for Peace program, which purchases crops at market price from American farmers and distributes them to hungry people abroad, from U.S.A.I.D. to the Agriculture Department. The lawmakers argued that their legislation fulfills the spirit of what Mr. Trump calls his āmandateā to slim down the federal bureaucracy and make it more efficient.
The G.O.P. lawmakers seeking reprieves from Mr. Trumpās cuts are quick to embrace his message that federal spending is out of control, while arguing that their stateās or districtās slice of government funding is critical."
Iām tellinā ya; some of those Dems have bellied up to the trough.
More like the lot of them:
Trump nominations loom over Senateās cherished Munich trip
https://www.axios.com/2025/02/13/thune-trump-munich-security-conference
Posted in another thread, but wanna bet this comes up?
Police said the suspect is believed to be a 24-year-old Afghan asylum seeker. Authorities have not yet suggested a motive or named the suspect.
Maybe one of Elonās minions can cancel their reservations?
The body blows just keep on comingā¦
< Gus Fring saying Do It.gif >
Both of my Senators voted yea. Assholes.
Both of mine too. One is a fascist, so no surprises there. Iām pissed at Baldwin though.
Mine were split. Ughhh!
Iād have some hope if the dems were to put up Rachel Levine as a shadow HHS secretary to counter the garbage brain worm will be putting out.
One of my Senators, Adam Schiff, voted in favor of confirmation. He spent much of Trumpās first term positioning himself as one of Trumpās most visible critics in Congress, but this time around he went on the record saying that he wants to be āmore than just a Trump antagonist.ā Which is crazy because Trump antagonists are exactly what we need right now!