Culture-Class Wars

At this point, both require magic, so maybe the plasma torches they use to try to get rid of nerve gas munitions? Dis-integration has many mechanisms.

1 Like

It’s not really magic to shoot something into interstellar space, we did that way back in the year I was born. It might take awhile, but maybe that’s appropriate.

3 Likes

Ok. Not efficient without magic. I generally assume at least the attempt.

Davos has always been the same “conspiracy”. Apparently the Q brigade noticed and are ramping up the confusion machine.

Naomi Klein has been following this for decades:

3 Likes

Victory!

4 Likes

Indeed, anyone with even a cursory knowledge of Davos speak, and the number of times it has attempted to rebrand capitalism as a slightly buggy poverty alleviation and ecological restoration program

Boy, that’s a lot to get out of “EX-TERM-IN-A”… Oh, wait. No “r” in there. Sorry.

2 Likes

It also makes it harder to talk about the profound realignment our economies and societies desperately need, a vision a group of us laid out in the short film we released way back in October called “The Years of Repair” — because now all talk about how we change for the better in response to the cruelties that Covid-19 has unveiled is immediately smeared as part of the Great Reset. As the historian Quinn Slobodian recently wrote, years after “The Shock Doctrine” was published, “the right was now appropriating this narrative for its own ends.” Meanwhile, the less fantastical but extremely real shock doctrine maneuvers currently waging war on public schools, hospitals, small farmers, environmental protections, civil liberties, and workers’ rights receive a fraction of the attention they deserve.

Oh, those things have been under attack since…well, the beginning of the Industrial Revolution?

2 Likes

Since rich people formed gangs to pillage without accountability, so … like … twelve thousand years. That’s not a reason to stop trying to deal with the problem though.

4 Likes
1 Like
9 Likes

One of the biggest culture-class wars going is the so-called “War on Drugs”. So it makes me glad that instead of the “Just Say No” I grew up with to see things like this:

That is the BC Center for Disease Control as we’re dealing with both the COVID pandemic and an opioid epidemic.

Don’t be fooled too much – the cops will still use the WoD to hassle folks if they feel like it – but this is the kind of messaging my province has taken the last few years. Another prominent ad campaign is humanizing addicts, emphasizing that addiction is just one part of a person’s personality (versus the older – albeit still popular in some circles – “just a junkie” implications). Harm reduction isn’t new: for years the province resisted Stephen Harper’s best attempts to shut down what was at the time the only safe-injection site in the country, but it’s only been lately that it’s become such public policy.

One big driver is the opioid crisis where suddenly “good” people started finding themselves and their loved ones caught up in addiction, when before¹ it was weak-willed, poor and/or (especially) First Nations and Indigenous people (Canada’s racist target of choice)², who middle class (white) folks had no problem locking up or dealing with punitively. When suddenly it’s Greg from work, instead of someone from the DTES, priorities change.

And then came along COVID-19. And while we’re managing better than places like the US, UK or Brazil, that’s not a high bar. Our medical system can’t handle both crises going full-bore at once. And COVID don’t care. It’s not checking your income status before sending you to the hospital. And since every BC resident³ is covered under MSP, there’s less people dying at home simply because they can’t afford the bill. I won’t say zero, but it’s a smaller part of the calculus than in the US. Throw in an already strained court system that now has to juggle social distancing and public health measures…

And so, suddenly, to meet the operational needs of the healthcare system, there’s been an even bigger ramp-up of government promotion of harm reduction versus criminal enforcement (I say enforcement, because the province has zero say over whether something is criminal or not, but can – especially with the help of municipalities – decide what priorities are most important). So, we’re seeing this cultural shift move hard from “Never, ever” to “Never is best, but if you must, here’s how to do it safe-ishly.”

I say suddenly, because when I was a teen and young adult, “harm reduction” was something only bleeding hearts and suckers were supposed to believe in, and now it’s the middle-of-the-road, somewhat conservative option. Less, I think, because we got more progressive and more because a “them” problem became more obviously an “Us” problem, and progressiveness was forced upon us.

My hope is that we keep going. That criminal enforcement of illegal drug use finds a priority somewhere below having your dog off-leash at the on-leash park. That we continue the shift into thinking in terms of public health instead of punitive measures and smug superiority. That we provide supports instead of shame.

It’s propaganda, sure. But changing the official dialogue around addiction and mental health can help close down a front in this war. There are plenty of others, but to see so public a change is encouraging. Once people get used to policies that make life better, rolling them back becomes a riskier proposition. Far more dangerous to afflict the comfortable than merely not comfort the afflicted.

In a world where people seem determined to make cruelty the point, I will take my points of hope where I can.

¹Nah, not really. But “the bad thing” always seemed to be happening to some other poor sap to be whispered about, not us.

²Of course the reality is that everyone deserves dignity, and the whole thing of us/them is an illusion – but superiority is a hell of a drug and Canadians really aren’t as nice as we pretend.

³Legal resident, of course. You can’t just move here tomorrow and get coverage.

8 Likes

Points and laughs

Yeah, I got no sympathy for this. A poor person locked out of their bank account is one thing, because we as individuals don’t get much of a choice about living under capitalism where being unbanked can fuck up large parts of basic survival, but these guys made a choice. Nobody forced them to invest in Bitcoin. You don’t have to have it to buy food or pay rent on a shitty apartment.

Besides, if you’re going to be so stupid as to go this route, then at least be smart enough to write your password down and store it in a safety deposit box somewhere. If you’ve got the spare cash to invest in vaporcash, you can afford rent on a box.

Don’t ever let anyone tell you that rich people are rich because they know how to manage money.

11 Likes

No, they know how to accumulate it huge amounts so that losing a little bit doesn’t hurt them.

5 Likes

Or losing all of it. Connections equal leverage.

3 Likes

I think you just have to be consumed with making more and more money, as vocation and avocation. No distractions.

1 Like
1 Like

Thieving corporate bureaucrats rely on bullshit justifications:

3 Likes

“Being poor is expensive.”

Back before I could afford to save up a lump sum to pay my insurance each year, I was on the “monthly payment plan” aka, a loan. Basically, the corp writes a loan including interest for that year’s worth of insurance, and you pay it back monthly. Said interest is less than a standard credit card, but not nothing or even minimal. Which, of course, makes it harder to save up for next year, trapping poorer people in a cycle of poverty, especially when they are more likely to need a personal vehicle due to poor public transit and high housing prices that force them to live further away from work.

Basically, the equation is the Sam Vimes’ “Boots Theory” turned into math. It is also, incidentally, my justification for game consoles and games: a $500 console for 5 years and an $80 game played for $400 hours work out as cheaper entertainment than going to the movies regularly. I have had plenty of people who pull the “You’re going to spend $500 on a toy and $80 on a game” line on me be taken aback when I explain it’s cheaper in the long run than their movies and dinners out, that the game console is also a blu-ray player and streaming services box, and is less than a decent computer that will probably still require upgrades before the 5 years is up.

I refuse to begrudge a poor person a TV and Xbox/Playstation/Switch. That may be the only source of entertainment they have, and the C/T is way cheaper than what an average, non-poor person pays without thinking about it. I have a 12 y/o 40" flat screen. It gets used a lot, almost daily. Poor people buy one cheap on Black Friday, or second hand from someone who decided to upgrade to a brand-new 8K, then use it until it dies, but still people use that as a shorthand for wasteful spending.

I know that I went a little off from the article, but it’s all part of the same vicious system.

13 Likes

I remember when folks who worked at a McD’s in Detroit, specifically on E. Jefferson Ave near Belle Isle, were striking for this, and my ex-bestie’s daughters both said that no one who works in fast-food should get more than min wage, as no one who didn’t have a college degree should get paid that much.

One is bi-polar and famous for not taking her meds, in her early 30s; the other quit nursing school at U of D/Mercy practically just before she would’ve been graduated, and took a job at a “classy bar” in Roseville. There are NO classy bars in Roseville, with perhaps Mr. Paul’s Chop House being an exception.

6 Likes