Elon Musk Destroys Everything

18 Likes

I suppose anything is possible.
Are they quantum ships?

16 Likes

The settlement of Mars has already been well analyzed by an actual human.

13 Likes

overload the tachyon drive and we’ll be in Tharsis City by tomorrow morning.
please fasten your safety harness and remain in your deceleration chair for the remainder of your flight.

15 Likes

Considering that appears to be the next up and coming grift, yes.

16 Likes

I Wonder why the Men of my generation are so gullible.

15 Likes

“perhaps with crewed versions passing near Mars [in ~2 years], and crewed Starships heading there in ~4 years are all possible.”

Ah, this is Musky’s space version of “the cars will be fully self-driving by next year” promise that he’s made for the last 12 years. “We don’t have the technology yet and it’s physically impossible, but besides that…”

21 Likes

And doesn’t it take 3 years just to get to Mars? :face_with_diagonal_mouth:

14 Likes

9 months, plus time to wait for alignment.

15 Likes

In case anyone wonders, the math here is actually wonderfully simple.

  • Earth’s orbit takes 1 year.
  • Mars’s orbit takes about 2 years. A couple months less, which means you have to wait a couple months more for it to be in the same place relative to the Earth.
  • An Earth-to-Mars orbit takes 1½ years, and a one way trip only uses half.

The last alignment just ended so right now a landing would indeed take 3 years. But I guess he did say approximately 2 years, so 3 or 5 or 7 or 99 still qualifies. :roll_eyes:

17 Likes

Yeah, specifically every 26 months, which also means a craft looking to return would have to wait in orbit around Mars for 16 months for the return 9 month journey, and we don’t remotely have the technology to keep humans alive for 34 months of full exposure to solar radiation. I guess, to be fair, Elon also didn’t specify that the astronauts would be alive during all of that journey.

11 Likes

We might want to do a quick search to make sure SpaceX hasn’t been asking about licensing to test :atom: rocket engines. :thinking:

9 Likes

He can’t drive 55?

11 Likes

Elon Musk has never showed the slightest interest in the problem of how to keep people alive. You pack a 747 full of people, figure out how to get it into space, and…look, we’ll give them in-flight entertainment or something, that definitely covers the problems with that. You’d think the fact that he’s never even mentioned how surviving might work would tip off people that’s all just verbal flatulence, but then you’d think everything else would too, so. Two years sounds impressive, right? Keep the investment coming!

18 Likes

Every dead colonist is just additional organic fertilizer for the next ship in Leon’s mind.

17 Likes

The problem (or whole set of problems, rather) of keeping people alive is all squishy biology, whereas Musk is clearly only interested in the straightforward, manly engineering issues of shooting giant phalluses into space. Musk obviously aspires to be one of the two-fisted engineer heroes of so many mid-century sci-fi stories, and his understanding of the issues around space flight seems to be almost entirely premised on his questionable understanding of said stories.

15 Likes

23 Likes

I can’t believe people still think this guy is a visionary genius when he seems to think getting to Mars is as simple as cramming some packets of Tang in your pockets, popping a fish bowl on your head and jumping really really high.

22 Likes
17 Likes
10 Likes