Ouch.
Well, you survived.
5 Likes
And the far side of Glenview today (basically Mt Prospect). “Once more unto the breach”.
4 Likes
14 Likes
…
*slow clap*
6 Likes
(On an unrelated note - I went looking for a clapping gif and discarded several since the people in them have … questionable histories. Hopefully we don’t find out this young ape secretly keeps a group of immigrant lemurs as household slaves)
8 Likes
I’d like to act surprised… But I’ll confess, that sounds exactly like something Quark would do.
5 Likes
Chimps eat colobus monkeys, which are considered bushmeat.
This ones eating something. Jussayin’.
5 Likes
Ironically, American football was invented because Rugger was killing too many players. Which is why it has the downs and the forward pass. Soccer also has concussion issues.
I think soccer could resolve these with bicycle helmets, which would protect against accidental impacts while discouraging headers. Of course players would have to learn other blocks and traps. Perhaps the rules could allow shoulders.
I don’t think American football can do that, unless it finds ways to reduce or eliminate deliberate collisions. But if Goodall cares about the players, I expect he would have already tried to find versions with lower injury rates, and insisted on a season switching among those rules.
3 Likes
Does anyone have a comparison of injuries and fatalities before and after armor?
4 Likes
3 Likes
When helmets were made mandatory for professional hockey players, commentators who were once pro players themselves, loudly worried that head and neck injuries would increase. They were right. They had to add rules to the game to end the deliberate hits to the head that didn’t happen prior to the helmet rule.
In retrospect, the league also deciding to harshly punish fighting in the same time frame absolutely contributed to the increase in head injuries. Asshole players faced few on-ice consequences for intentional hits beyond a few minutes in the sin bin. You’re not going to try to ring a marquee player’s bell if you know you’re going to get your face pounded on by the opposing team’s “enforcer.”
7 Likes
That might have been a redistribution of head injuries more than an increase, though. The enforcers had their own head injury problems from all the fights they got into.
6 Likes
I must be missing something here…
Why would adding helmets make other players more likely to hit people in the head? Unless refs stopped caring about hits to the head? But you imply that’s when they started caring about fights in general?
1 Like
In hockey, a “hit to the head” doesn’t necessarily mean that that’s the point of contact between the player hitting and the one being hit; it implies that that’s the part that will take the most impact from the hit. So, a “hit to the head” might mean that someone is fighting for the puck, and a player from the other team gets a head of steam, hits them in the back, and plows them into the boards, with the head taking the force of that secondary impact.
it’s obvious that if you ram someone who is not wearing a helmet into the boards, head first, at full speed, that there is a high risk of a head injury. It is less obvious that the player receiving the hit will only have a lessened risk of the same, and not a total elimination of the risk, if that player is wearing a helmet; it’s especially less obvious by how much the risk has been reduced.
9 Likes
5 Likes
“What aren’t we listening to?”
SMFH
6 Likes
“Malcolm, is the message being lost…”
4 Likes