Possibly untrue science news

Did they finally find the math particle?

15 Likes

One of the ways I’ve heard it said is that god rested for six days and pulled an all nighter on the seventh.

13 Likes

If math itself generates the universe which we want to describe, with terms such as “space” and “time”, but those ideas don’t exist outside of the math because they arise from the math itself, then how do we separate the math from the particles which exist only because they do the math?

6 Likes

You might be able to use maths to describe the universe. Doesn’t mean you don’t need other fields to help us understand the universe and our place in it. :woman_shrugging:

10 Likes

Saying people don’t matter, because maths is not particularly helpful dude. WE do exist and while math is a useful tool for understanding doesn’t make everything we do insignificant or pointless. It’s a bit insulting to say that
 I get that the universe is big, vast, etc
 But WE’RE still here and have to make the best of the time we have. That MATTERS and I’m frankly sick of being told it doesn’t. YOU might not give a shit if me and mine live or die, but sure as fuck do.

10 Likes

Well not everyone does. I find it really fucking dismissive of my entire working life. But hey, I’m just some dumb failed academic, so what the fuck do I know


8 Likes

Speaking as a Black woman surviving in America:

My “place” is NOT what what I made it; it was entrenched long before I was ever even conceived.

If math and science were all that mattered, the world would NOT be in its’ current state of decline.

13 Likes

To some extent I don’t think the distinction is a meaningful one. Our conception of reality has always been a model. Our minds don’t encounter persistent objects – they get fed little flashes of light and sensations from our fingertips, and invented the idea of objects to explain them. Math is really just modeling in a rigorous way. I’m not sure what the difference between a universe of math and not of math would be.

That said
do you know how quantum field theory actually works? It’s not like spacetime where some relatively simple abstraction turns out to beautifully explain everything. Everything happens in Fock spaces, which are very much the mathematical equivalent of saying “Wait, we have to have variable numbers of particles now? Ok, screw it, let’s just take all the states that do make sense and
I don’t know, add them up in some hypothetical vector space.” And mathematically you can do that, because of course math lets you do anything so long as it’s rigorous and consistent. But on an intuitive level it looks extremely like a clunky-but-functional description of something else to me.

12 Likes

My mathing has never been on par with some of my other abilities, but I sort of grasp what you are saying. Math is an exceptionally effective tool to assist in modeling, predicting and understanding the universe and our place in it. But to say math is the universe (or that the universe is math) is a level of abstraction I cannot follow. I accept that folks who do understand that kind of God-level abstract math can get a theoretical handle on things that just conceptually are beyond my grasp, and that this probably represents a higher truth, but I also think we are a long way from being able to make a useful, understandable model of it.

IOW, I are not a smart man. Just tryin’ to get a little learnin’.

11 Likes

That right there
 If we’re truly insignificant specks, it’s a bit of hubris to assume that we can accurately gauge the universe in almost anyway.

And even if it is as people say, we’re not that abstract. We’re here and we’re real and we matter, and we need more than one way to understand the reality around us. Hence other kinds of science. Hence art. Hence history. Hence medicine. Etc. Maths are just one way to grok the universe, and dismissing all over forms of human knowledge is not particularly helpful. There is no ONE right way to grok the world. But lately, we’ve been told over and over again that the only thing that matters is STEM. But history can tell us what kind of path that blinkered way of thinking about reality can lead, and frankly, it’s no where good. :woman_shrugging: But again, we’ve been destroying the humanities and dismissing it for years now. So, people think it’s a fun luxury rather than a necessity in modern life.

8 Likes

additionally. as per gödel 2, math cannot demonstrate consistency on its own; and, even within a consistent sytem, it is possible to formulate unprovable statements.

i realize there are many ways to interpret the world but we must be open to failure and true to reality at whatever scale is applicable. if the facts are being edited to suit the theory, that’s no science at all.

10 Likes

Exactly so.

8 Likes

What I’m saying is that math is how rigorous models are expressed, and when you say “the universe is
” you are inherently going to be offering some kind of model on the other end.

In regard to what Mindy is saying, I should also note that even with Newtonian mechanics, the moment there are as many as three particles the underlying math becomes unsolvable without approximations. A single atom is too much! So while the physics is important it’s at the same time very limited in what it actually helps us understand on its own.

11 Likes

Models are always going to be imperfect approximations, whatever the field. Can we even understand the “real”? I just don’t know
 but we have to have ways to understand the reality we live in, even if they’re imperfect. I just fully reject the notion that there is one “right” way of understanding and humbly submit that knowledge is always a collective effort that needs a variety of perspectives to fully grok. That’s a very enlightenment-centric view, that all fields of study are inherently valuable, because they give us a piece of this very complex puzzle.

But we need to understand that there has been an effort in recent years (especially since the end of the Cold War) to bury some forms of knowledge because it speaks some needed truth to power, specifically the humanities. Because it centers people and our many ways of actually existing in the world, it’s considered dangerous by some who wish to retain power at the expense of the rest of us. But, much like forms of oppression we’re seeing rise up now (like that aimed at trans folks), if they can target fields like the humanities, they will come for everything else. That’s how it’s been playing out. The 2008 crash gave an in for dismantling humanities departments in universities around the world. Now they are coming for everyone else that dares to do anything other than parrot the oligarch’s talking points.

It’s time we give up this stupid point less “STEM v. humanities” war and focus on the actual threat to universities and the pursuit of human knowledge in general.

10 Likes

But math is a social construct. Which makes it he endeavor a bit solipsistic.

10 Likes

TANGENT INCOMING!
Mindy, your use of the typically UK English “maths” over the USAian “math” has intrigued me!
Is it a personal affectation? Is there a story behind it? Is it an academic thing?

11 Likes

Honestly, I just like the way it sounds
 probably a byproduct of too much Doctor Who!

And other British shows


young-ones-sick-of-this

14 Likes

You know my husband and I talk about this from time to time and there’s always something dancing on the back of my mind with it because I actually agree. Like fully agree.

But MATH is also a human exercise, another people thing, a philosophy, a practice, a way we use our consciousness to understand the universe. You could just as easily say that dance, or music, or poetry is a way to understand the universe as math.

Math is the best tool for predicting material phenomena.

But i guess what really bothers me is that if I understand anything about the universe it’s that reductive logic doesn’t describe it well. Call it math or call it music but it depends on what part of the universe one is trying to understand.

I guess I just wish that where this got us more often than not was more
 like, a shared joy in the mutual experience of understanding what we can in our little lives.

7 Likes

6 Likes

The way I see it frankly, we are buggy meat computers incapable of analyzing our own infrastructure and most of our understanding comes from a constantly degenerating script we cobble together from a fusion of memory and fantasy regulated by hormones and sleep cycles.

Concepts like “real” are just going to break us if we try to make sense of them.

As the great Michael Gira said: “you’re not real, girl.”

It’s fun sometimes to walk up to the limits of my own mind and look out and think “shiii
 bet there’s a lot more than that out there.” But ultimately that’s what math gets you too. Humanistic supremacy is a pointless concept at scale. We are so small between the stars, so large against the sky.

Fuck yeah!

I was studying “the Arts” in that liminal space where they kicked it out out of the humanities into the vocations but then didn’t put it into steAm yet.

:clown_face:

8 Likes