What am I looking at? Is it an “AI” mashup? Both useless and incomprehensible? What joke am I missing?
Maybe a different angle will make things less puzzling?
Oooooor maybe not.
I do not want to know what’s going on there disturbingly close to the groin.
It’s like someone decided to combine the worst parts of both shorts and kilts as some kind of challenge.
Plus, you get free shipping on orders over $99!
also available for men
https://www.farfetch.com/shopping/men/maison-margiela-cut-out-tailored-shorts-item-14844991.aspx
Combine Maison Margiela’s expert tailoring ability with male eroticism and you get these navy blue wool cut-out tailored shorts, which are one of many utilitarian inspired pieces making references to uniforms of those in public services. Featuring a hook and zip fly, belt loops, side flap pockets and cut out details.
There’s probably video of it on the catwalk, but it’s a little boring.
Also has a hint of bib overalls put on backwards and worn in the dumbest way possible?
They all look like they’re related to him.
They all look like the guy put his black jockstrap on upside-down.
It all boils down to
WHY?
I can no longer read Vogue without an account.
(the important keyword was “male eroticism”)
Look via an incognito window, works for me.
To quote Groucho Marx,
“Either he’s got those things on upside down or there is no gravity. Einstein or no Einstein.”
I read that as “I can no longer read Vogue without an accent.” It somehow seems apropos.
You are not alone in that initial read.
actually a decent idea. French websites ask for permission before depositing cookies, and I need a broad array of foreign sources if I’m ever to learn the language.
I can no longer read Vogue without an accountant
I can no longer read Vogue without incontinence.
I can no longer read Vogue without acrimony
I can no longer read Vogue without acquiring Conde Nast Publications.
Hex bolts? On a watch??
It’s such a mess I didn’t even notice those. Good eye.