Snarking snark when the snark don't snark

Who should stop naiow?

When the snark is dumb or is aimed so high the boomerang gets lost in the weeds. To start:


“Area man disagrees with President, promotes colleagues and friends’ work, laughs in public at memes of himself”

None of those seem so egregious. He’s not promoting Nazism or other hate-mongering.

Also, as someone who does follow his account, pretty sure he’s known about Black Twitter for a while now.

And, um, the whole point of social media is to say stuff. The author’s entire argument could be turned against her, or anyone else.