Hah?
I’m curious about this, too. The National Review’s latest issue is almost 100% stories about Elizabeth Warren, featuring her (in Trumpian faux-Native get up) on the cover.
The whole conservative press is going after her, while he remains fixed on Biden. Just can’t let go? Is Biden the only one he sees as his “equal”, as a rich white guy with a notorious failson?
Who also likes to grab boobs, and I don’t mean the failsons?
My guess is that it’s because he is caught up in the weird right wing bizzaro news world where they have concocted this whole scenario around Biden’s son. Remember that their news is like from another planet. It won’t make sense to you.
That would be cool!
I feel old now. THANKS.
And she may be needed in the House of Reps. more than the WH; we’ll just have to wait and see.
I just like her policies. And I agree; she’s needed in the House.
The context was that “population control” doesn’t work at all without women being much more than passive participants in the patriarchy—they have to be an industrial-sized, dominant component in taking it down.
I am now reconsidering my vote…
Are you pondering what I’m pondering?
I think so, but where are we going to get a pineapple at this time of night?
Well I’m glad Pete Buttgieg is in this race to defend health insurers. Student loan servicers next, Pete?
Pardon me - bit salty that loan servicers capitalized an extra 26k on to my husband’s loans because they didn’t consider our jointly-filed tax returns to be a good enough verification of my income.
candidates shouting like they think they’re making stump speeches in a cornfield, telling anecdotes about themselves nobody cares about, interrupting each other and addressing each other in the second person, talking past the end of their time while the moderators whine and refuse to cut anybody off
this format doesn’t seem to have changed any since the '80s
You know, when I lived in IA, sometimes I swear I’d hear stump speeches on the wind.
17 or 18?