How do you make optical quality glass?
http://www.pbs.org/how-we-got-to-now/home/
Thatâs why I specifically went with the answer I did. The technology either already existed and just needed recombining, or the results are obvious when implemented.
Frankly, Pratchett nailed it on germ theory: lie to people. Convince them that it appeases a spirit or lifts a curse, instead. Eventually the scientific explanation will emerge and take over, but in the meantime, youâve saved people from horrible deaths by encouraging the behaviour. Science may rule the world, but people do what you want with Headology.
I think one way would be if you reinvent the printing press release something everyone wants. Popular plays, porn anything but include an appendix telling people how to make printing presses as well as primers on things like kinetic theory of gases, basic algebra, cartesian coordinate systems. Also plans for kites, sextants oil lamps etc. As well as two column bookkeeping and other stuff to poke people in the right direction.
Seems like those are good ideas for making society better, but how does one use that to their advantage? Thatâs the question posed by the OP. By 1AD, Romans already had soap. And a strong bathing culture.
Food preservation tho, especially through canning and pasteurization, would be easy enough. I would think it would be best used in military applications - sending troops out with enough food that they didnât have to plunder and scavenge. Thatâs what it was developed for in the first place, by Napolean, iirc. But how to monetize that? I suppose youâd have to convince the emperor and get a government contract.
Aside: maybe itâs just because Iâm in a writing class at the moment, but I feel like this whole thread is designed to help @haystack come up with ideas for a novelâŚ
So, what we need to do now is convince people that the only way to appease the demons that cause drought, hurricanes and rising sea levels is to throw James Inhofe and Scott Pruitt into a volcano.
Useful people are less likely to be killed.
The printing press seems like jumping the gun to me, given that Rome was still using papyrus, and that the 2%-5% of the population who could read already had slaves to copy for them. There just wasnât a mass market for it to serve. Although, youâre onto something with porn. Engravings of all sorts would have had wide appeal.
But I think people are underestimating the importance of the prerequisite wood or rag-based paper. Itâs an easy technology to replicate and thereâd be an eager market for it in Rome. A cheap writing medium, by itself, would do wonders for literacy.*
*China invented papermaking around 105CE, but Iâm unable to find any data comparing their literacy rates to Rome
I donât know easy optical glass would be (I certainly donât know enough to do it) but if you did that, eyeglasses would be a much more impactful and profitable business, I would think.
Drips and drabs for the rest of your life. Useful people mustnât tell secrets to our neighbors.
It sounds like you need to start up this:
And there are so many things that could be ritualised like that. Boiling water before drinking it drives out evil influences, burning the bones of sacrificial animals and scattering the ash on the land is pleasing to the gods, who will reward you with better harvests, Lead is a cursed metal and it will drive people who drink from it mad, and so on.
perhaps the real trick is to avoid being mistaken for a witch
Thatâs easy. Just prove that you donât weigh the same as a duck.
I donât think pre-Christian Romans would care if you actually were though? I mean, wouldnât they just assume youâre either a member of one of the many cults in Rome or from somewhere that wasnât Rome, following whatever your faith was?
I mean⌠I guess Iâd just want to satisfy my curiosity of what life was actually like back then?
As long as you paid lip service to the Roman gods they really didnât care for the most part what you did or even didnât believe as far as religion went. The early Christians were unwilling to do that and we all know how well that worked for them.
[quote=âmindysan33, post:56, topic:510, full:trueâ]
I mean⌠I guess Iâd just want to satisfy my curiosity of what life was actually like back then?
[/quote]Itâs a nice thought, especially as a historian and all. But youâre never going to find yourself back in a future horribly ruined by unanticipated consequences like that. Couldnât you at least warn people about a few major disasters, inadvertently causing the Mediterranean slave trade to flourish into modern times, or something?
I think the last thing Iâd want to bring back to 1AD is a new religion, no matter how scientific itâs foundation. Though it would be interesting to come back to the present and see how it had been perverted over time. I mean, Jesus (AFAWK) basically said âletâs love one another and help each otherâ and look what people did with that messageâŚ
Well, they werenât incredibly tolerant of Jews, either. It seems like monotheism was something they couldnât abide until Constantine.
Monotheism was a rejection of their gods, thatâs why.
As they say, Christians are the best atheists. They just have one more God left to go.