The goddamn Trump Administration (Part 2)

The NHK article phrased it as

Trump said the deal involves what he calls “reciprocal tariffs” on Japanese imports set at 15 percent.

My emphasis.

When he trotted out his tariffs in April, he used the term “reciprocal tariffs” to mean “tariffs in proportion to our trade deficit”, because he’s trying to sell the idea that a trade deficit and a tariff are equivalent.

I believe he might be making the same stupid error here. Or it might be a new exciting stuipd error. Far be it from me to same-wash his word salad.

30 Likes

He promised to apply 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods. These agreements, with figures far lower than the threat the local economy is facing, could undermine public opinion, which could turn against President Lula and the authorities, who are making statements that they will not bow to Mr. Trump’s whims.

25 Likes

You’re gonna be rich!

25 Likes

43 Likes

But, but, Very Stable Genius!!

Facepalm Gif

27 Likes

Yeah, it is a real factor in these kinds of lawsuits. I literally had a bar exam practice question a couple of days ago that involved the admissibility of reputation evidence, and that was why it was admissible. Because if you’re suing for defamation, and your reputation is already shit . . .

33 Likes
34 Likes

Fight Club Jack's Complete Lack Of Surprise GIF | GIFDB.com

32 Likes
29 Likes

Well, DUH!!!

Worth clicking through, though. Some bits bear repeating:

Those who viewed Trump favorably reported higher levels of malevolent traits and lower levels of benevolent ones. In other words, Trump supporters scored higher on traits such as Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy—which reflect manipulativeness, entitlement, emotional callousness, impulsivity, and antisocial behavior—and lower on traits such as humanism, faith in humanity, and Kantianism, which reflect compassion, belief in others’ basic goodness, and a commitment to treating people as ends rather than means.

These differences were not explained by other factors such as age, income, education level, or minority status.

Yet it is odd how many MAGAs are older white people, often of the male persuasion, with lower education levels. (See * note below.)

One of the study’s most striking findings was the consistent link between empathy and political orientation. While people across the political spectrum are capable of empathy, the results suggest that those on the political right—especially those aligned with Trump—may experience and express empathy differently.

Supporters of Trump were less likely to feel concern for others’ suffering (lower affective empathy) and more likely to enjoy or be indifferent to others’ distress (higher dissonant empathy). Importantly, these differences were not found in cognitive empathy. Trump supporters were just as able as others to recognize emotions in others—they simply appeared to care less, on average.

The words ‘express … differently’ doing some hard work at the end of the first para above, but their usage here is defined at the end of the second para above. They express empathy ‘differently’ by just caring less about other people. (See * note below.)

And here’s the * note:

The findings do not mean that all Trump supporters are manipulative or lack compassion, nor that all non-supporters are empathetic or benevolent. Individuals within each group vary widely, and the results reflect differences in average tendencies, not universal characteristics.

So yeah while some of this may appear to be “statements of the bleedin’ obvious”, the implied question I’ve made bold below is clear that, yes, some people’s political ideology is about malevolent domination of others.

“Political ideology (left vs. right leaning; liberal vs. conservative) is not necessarily a good or bad thing, if it involves ideas about how to productively arrange our world. However, if a given ideology is fundamentally about one group’s malevolent domination of other individuals, then we should ask ourselves if this is the type of (uncivil) society we want to live in. For instance, does taking Medicaid away from vulnerable people while also giving money to the wealthy involve political malevolence or benevolence?”

And ‘malevolent domination’ is really another way of describing intolerance. Time for the Popper axiom again. We should not tolerate these people.

27 Likes

I feel like this was the testing environment.

27 Likes

Interviewer: You’re walking through the desert, encounter a tortoise, and flip it on its back.

MAGA: Yeah, ok.

Interviewer: It’s baking in the hot sun, it’s legs are waving around.

MAGA: HA!

Interviewer: You’re not helping it.

MAGA: Hilarious!

Interviewer: …

MAGA: Make me poke it with a stick!

Interviewer taking notes: Subject expresses empathy differently.

39 Likes

At the sure risk of over-generalizing, this discovery of a lack of empathy ‘on the right’ is nearly plain in the names of the political poles: socialism vs conservatism. The latter is a bit encoded, but it certainly suggests keeping what has been accumulated among those who grabbed the goods first. freely admitting that my father used to deride me: “you’ve slipped to the left of trotsky, boy!” (now where did i stash my Bernie for prez button?)

24 Likes

“obligation to comply”

No, there isn’t.

29 Likes

Belief in others’ basic goodness? But that’s what MAGA is killing in me. Is this how they convert?

26 Likes

Wait till the likes of Miller and co get hold of this, it will be like “alternative facts” (lies) all over again. Everything they do (which, of course, always involves some element of hatred or violence) will end up being defined as “just expressing our empathy differently”.

18 Likes

I instinctively distrust anyone who gives duckface as their normal look.

24 Likes

21 Likes

But “said” is just another word for “lied” in the context of Trump. Who knows what the actual reality is. In many cases we haven’t heard from the countries involved in these “deals” yet, nor seen anything signed (or even written down), which is a series of red flags. In this case we have some confirmation from Japan, at least, but nothing in writing.

The only thing that seems certain is that the trade deal is leaving everyone worse off than before. Elements that Trump is touting - e.g. Japan being open to US vehicles and agriculture. It already was - they had some agricultural tariffs, but everything else was pretty much nonexistant; they just never wanted what America has to offer, in those regards. American car companies are designing and building giant vehicles purely for the domestic market, with no consideration for what works elsewhere; as a result many other countries don’t want them (they don’t even fit on the roads, for one). Japan buys California rice, but is, for understandable reasons, big on domestic food production. Only when demand exceeds the supply of domestic rice do they buy significant quantities from the US.

American consumers are in for a shock - up until now we haven’t felt the impact of the tariffs, because importers mass-purchased before they went into effect, and assuming the tariffs would be temporary, have been eating any excess costs. The Trump administration claims exporters are eating the cost, but it’s a very obvious lie - the data shows that, discounting tariffs, import prices have actually gone up. As soon as importers come to terms with the fact that the tariffs are here to stay, prices are going up to match them.

Well, yes, they’re right, they certainly aren’t achievable.

It’s increasingly shocking to me that the press continues to sane-wash Trump, even as he says crazier and crazier things. We get headlines along the lines of, “Trump promises drug costs will go down” when he says something that’s completely insane and which would be embarrassing even if a small child said it.

This is a huge problem - Trump is always speaking gibberish, even when he says words that appear to make sense, he actually means something else by them. And what he thinks they mean is usually based on whatever delusion exists only inside his head, so there’s no connection to reality. Which means any pronouncement is worthless, in terms of information conveyed.

In this case, even if Japan isn’t imposing a reciprocal tariff, Japanese consumers, like everyone else in the world, are turned off by Trump’s nonsense and are far less likely to buy US goods. (Though in Japan’s case, Trump is making the biggest deal about products they traditionally have not and still won’t be buying from the US.)

@sqlrob
Yeah, pretty much universally the impact of these tariffs is to increase costs to American consumers and damage domestic production, because even in the cases where there are US-made alternatives, they’re going to be equally or even more expensive. I know Trump is impervious to being educated, and he’s very fixated on “winning” via tariffs, but he’s surrounded by people who know better. It sure seems like their goal is to destroy the American economy.

Supposedly only 1% of the population are psychopaths, but it’s pretty clearly more like 25%, at least selectively. “Selectively” in the sense that some people are effectively only psychopaths towards members of “out groups.” I suppose the good news, if they’re not “really” psychopaths, is that education can (theoretically) fix that. (The bad news is that we’re moving in the opposite direction, which means even more people are going to be like this.)

27 Likes

It sure seems like their goal is to make money personally by shorting and insider dealing and other financial investment shenanigans. It will ruin the US economy in the process, but who cares - they’ll have theirs.

22 Likes