The Nazification of the World

If you are following Rowling recently, she is getting weird.

5 Likes

I do follow her, though I can’t say I’ve read every last public statement.

And I haven’t spotted anything, except for people crawling through her Twitter follows for evidence to hang her with. “She follows X, so she must support Y”, that sort of thing.

The sort of thing anyone on this forum could be judged guilty for, given some of our past visitors.

4 Likes

#SomethingNotEasilyDisowned

2 Likes
7 Likes

“advocated the replacement of US democracy with a theocracy and the killing of all males who do not agree”

Because only men could possibly be a threat, I guess.

7 Likes

The “Biblical Basis for War” screed doesn’t elaborate. It fetishes the idea of an army composed of all able bodied males between 18 and 45.

6 Likes

Heh, let 'em think that.

6 Likes

what’s the “biblical” equivalent of “barefoot and pregnant?” The document refers to

5 Exemptions from Service:

  1. Training Family – New Home;
  2. Newlyweds–NewWife;
  3. Farmer – New Crops;
  4. Scared–Fear Means a Lack of Faith(OffertoLeave);or
  5. Priests – Duty to Ministry in Temple.

choose the appropriate level of creepiness.

7 Likes

= women (of childbearing age)?

I hope this guy (and his followers) are locked away for good.

3 Likes

He’ll get a pardon during Trump’s third term.

1 Like

An age range he would coincidentally fall just outside of by the time anything of the sort was established, I notice.

6 Likes

Op ed in the times.

7 Likes

Human diversity is good.
biodiversity is good

“Human biodiversity” has troubling implications— the foxes and the hares aren’t social equals.

4 Likes

I was wondering when this would happen – a trans woman who has been transitioned for 15 years is facing losing her job for transphobia:

2 Likes

Hayton wore the T-shirt at an event organised by Fair Play for Women, a campaign group, in July.

“Fair Play for Women” doesn’t like trans people. Depending on the exclusivity of the “LGBT committee of the Trades Union Congress”, this (removing her from the committee) may simply be good politics, Her right to be on the committee may depend on the perception that she represents the interests of people with every right to be seriously annoyed.

3 Likes

Ms Hayton (apt name) is FPFW’s anti-trans uno card.

FPFW, contrary to their name, does not advocate for funding womens’ sports or health care. They’re a front for American evangelical groups, founded with the express goal of banning trans women from public life.

FPFW promotes shit like “Pronouns are Rohpynol” and contributed hugely to the Bathroom Moral Panic.

This isn’t the first time Ms Hayton has gone about insisting that Hayton believes that trans women are not women, either.

Weird how “feminist” groups in the UK keep turning out tone almost exclusively white, classier, anti-intersectional, anti-trans.

FPFW’s founder and director has some very shitty opinions about Caster Semeya, fwiw.

(For the record, there have been no Trans Olympians to date. Trans athletes have a difficult time competing because of low hormonal levels – cis women, for example, have 10x higher testosterone on average than trans women.)

screenshot
7 Likes

There’s some kind of irony in this story, to be sure. For me it’s more that “trans woman who has been transitioned for 15 years denies that trans women are women”. Which I mean, sure, I guess that is bound to happen – you will find people with all sorts of opinions on their own races, genders, orientations, and so on – but it does seem odd in this case, since “believing you are really a woman” seems like it would be pretty integral to being a trans woman? I found her self-introduction on twitter, and that at least clarifies her take: gender is variable and we should let people express it how they want, but biological sex is binary and fixed and it’s a mistake to run things as if it were not.

What’s not clear to me is what the job in jeopardy actually is. Accusations of bigotry can certainly be weaponized even against the people they are supposed to protect – just look at who is being called anti-Semitic in the US these days – but it sounds like maybe Hayton is meant to represent trans* people? In which case it does seem like her ideology, which most biologists I’ve heard from seem to consider oversimplified to the point of falsehood and most trans* people I’ve heard from consider an attack, would make her a pretty awful fit for that role. Right now major sources are things like the Times and Telegraph, which as usual have no interest in considering any angle except PC nonsense has gone too far and don’t make any other concerns clear.

4 Likes

If you need to transition, you need to transition. Regardless of whether you believe that you are already a woman, or become one through transition, or can never actually become one. Gatekeepers sometimes require belief.

It frustrates me that Gendercrits often say we need to go through more gatekeeping and also need to stop saying we’re women.

6 Likes

I get that. The philosophy and memory of causality of it, if it ever shows itself, comes later.

1 Like
4 Likes