I still don’t understand how being swayed only by evidence isn’t agnosticism. It doesn’t have to be wishy-washy either; I for one am vehemently agnostic - fundamentalist, even.
how about start a thread about agonistic vs. atheist, instead of derailing a thread that’s about an entirely unrelated topic. Isn’t that the beauty of discourse? But, you know, I’m American, so I’m a dumb asshole.
If this seems unreadable, I apologize: I’m new to Discourse-based software and lack the wolf’s deft touch.
I split some posts here after a massive derail.
I’m guessing that’s rhetorical irony.
I guess. Whatever?