Everybody sing along with Brucie!
I quite like the suggestion that the EU27 should just vote to grant the UK a lengthy extension even if they donāt ask for one. It would only become effective if the UK consented, but then at least Johnson would have to put some effort into explaining how everything bad about no deal is our fault.
328 works out to 52% ā slightly more than the popular vote that started all this in the first place:
I heard they were planning on limiting the amount of debate on the anti-no-deal legislation in order to prevent BoJo from tying it up in 90 hours of red tape; any word on if they succeeded in that?
Edit to add:
Also, I keep hearing the term āremove the whip.ā
I get that itās kind of being used in the sense that these MPs are being thrown out of the Conservative Party, but I feel Iām missing the nuance of it. Can I please get a more precise explanation about whatās being done to the ārebel MPs?ā
Edit to add #2: Hereās the ā90 hoursā thing I was talking about:
It really sounds like the speaker did their job, which is amazing. When Canada had Harper, the speaker let the Cons get away with stuff even elementary school kids know is not procedure.
As for the drums and torches ā Iām envious, not that they were needed, but that they appeared. Canadians havenāt had that sort of passion about politics since before I was born.
Ah, okay. That makes sense.
We have Whips in Canada, too (I think the US has them as well), so I got that part; I just was unclear about what the consequence being threatened specifically by āremoving the whipā was.
Thanks!
Got it, thanks.
Theyāve finalized that? Last I heard, the prorogue started sometime next week, but an exact date hadnāt been set.
wtf?
this seems like modern politics in a nutshell right here
How is this even supposed to help?
Passing a law that says āwe canāt leave without a dealā doesnāt stop the clock from running out.
It seems optimistic to assume that Boris would do as heās told, especially that particular thing
I think he specifically said āI refuse to do thisā
This is the part Iām wondering about ā what happens when the extensions run out? Does the UK try to convince the EU to take them back at some point?
Ya know, this critter could solve some significant problems in about one second if it wanted to.
This nightmare is never going to end.
Please forgive a silly Yankee question, but is yāknow, just staying an actual option? Because that would seem like a reasonable path forward.
I mean, Iām saying this from the septic tank that is the USA, so no shade, it just seems like self-inflicted wound. In that way, we do seem to have much in common, as in cutting off our noses to spite our racist faces, err⦠something like that.
52% of the voters said āyesā to an ambiguous referendum, so anything short of the most extreme Brexit-- currently no deal, maybe Fuckwad will start insisting on nuclear strikes to up the ante-- is obviously a betrayal of the will of the people, as revealed to the leaders of the Brexit movement.
Ur-Fascism may apply.
-
Cult of tradition. doubtful, since theyāre willing to sacrifice parliament and all of Britainās constitutional traditions.
-
Rejection of modernism. not sure.
-
Action for actionās sake. definitely.
-
Disagreement is treason. likely, given their rhetoric and BoJoās purge of the Tory party.
-
Fear of difference. definitely, considering anti-immigrant hatred.
-
Appeal to a frustrated middle class. not sure.
-
Obsession with a plot. given the state of the world, who wouldnāt have this?
-
Followers feeling humiliated. ditto.
-
Life is permanent warfare. doubtful.
-
Contempt for the weak. definitely an issue with Tory policy in general, e.g. disability cuts.
-
Everyone is educated to become a hero. doubtful.
-
Machismo. not ready to look into that, þyvm.
-
Selective populism. definitely, what got me checking the list.
-
Newspeak. not sure.
From what Iāve heard, revoking Article 50 is an option, but the āremainā vote would have to have at least as much weight as the āleaveā vote did. Which means another referendum.