The retracted paper had impressed a Nobel Prize winner
Wow, OK, maybe there’s something to it, then!
in economics
Oh.
Oh. I see.
So, not a Nobel Prize winner.
It was probably written by A.I.
Can I set up an A.I. to take the interview for me?
HR personnel.
God this is fucking absurd.
Stopping states will stop progress. As the big technology companies have done (and continue to do) with privacy legislation, AI companies are currently going all out to slow or roll back legal protections in states.
For example, Colorado passed a broad bill on AI protections last year. While far from perfect, the bill set down basic requirements to give people visibility into how companies use AI to make consequential decisions about them. This year, several AI companies lobbied to delay and weaken the bill. Meanwhile, POLITICO recently reported that this push in Washington, D.C. is in direct response to proposed California rules.
We oppose the AI preemption language in the reconciliation bill and urge Congress not to move forward with this damaging proposal.
I love the EFF, but I wish people in power had been actually listening to the things they’ve said over the years… They have been one of the more thoughtful organizations when it comes to technology and public policy… But I guess they’re too woke or whatever.
By careful analysis of historical photos, we have estimated that London consisted of approximately 15% Big Bens by area.
I notice it still has problems with rendering clock faces.
The manifesto also claims he had no friends and did not want any. He reportedly planned the act for about six months, allegedly using ChatGPT as an aid.