Thatâs humorous enough I wonder if itâs intentional. If a tray liner is just going to have a bunch of random âthis is foodâ words and imagery on it that doesnât really add anything but background noise, I think the bumbling hallucination version is actually more enjoggable.
Bood rhymes better than good, so why not?
Comes with red crayon for markup.
Itâs a pretty short trip.
Because researchers did not have to hunt for information themselves, their âdepth of knowledgeâ was markedly lower than those who did. âIn this sense, one might view learning through LLMs rather than web search as analogous to being shown the solution to a math problem rather than trying to solve it oneself,â the research concludes.
That seems like an obvious conclusion, but I guess with the onslaught of billions and billions of dollars worth of hype, we now need âmultiple studiesâ to prove it.
Itâs scary to think that with the river of hype flowing so fast and deep, such studies just get washed away, pretty much without notice.
Itâs truly disturbing how, despite all the obvious, serious downsides and (to me) no real, apparent upsides, thereâs such a mad rush among institutions to get A.I. integrated into primary education ASAP so that American Students wonât âfall behind the rest of the worldâ in A.I.
And I wish this were just a Trump administration thing but a little while back I heard a very frustrating interview with Bidenâs A.I. czar who was pushing the exact same bullshit.
Does this mean Iâll have to pay some sort of license fee to my parents for using their genetic information?
If you had a twin brother, he could sue you for plagiarism.
Tragic story, but this part is disturbing to me:
So even in the immediate aftermath of his sonâs death that he attributes in part to AI dependance, he couldnât resist using it to write his sonâs obituary? What hope is there for society to ever stop relying on AI if this tragedy still wasnât enough to convince the father from taking a break from using it?