It is kinda weird to be attacking the demographic most responsible for your win. But, in the words of the famous philosopher, “Stupid is as stupid does.”
12 Likes
But not the demographic most responsible for his win.
10 Likes
I am, probably unreasonably, bothered by the fact that left-leaning shows are on the right side of the graph, and right-leaning shows are on the left. I mean, I know left and right in this context are arbitrary labels, but still…that bugs the shit out of me.
13 Likes
You wouldn’t know from reading this New York Times story about Trump punishing the University of Pennsylvania for trans athletes that there are no trans athletes on women’s teams at the University of Pennsylvania because the New York Times didn’t find that detail worth including
21 Likes
NYT is not a reputable news source. It should be ignored utterly.
18 Likes
9 Likes
Or – since it is still widely regarded with reverence – attended to with its lack of integrity always in mind. That this or that person says or writes something good or bad there still matters.
9 Likes
You be you. I’m treating it with every bit the same amount of attention I would to OANN. That being none.
13 Likes
I get it, and I’m not blaming you. I mostly ignore it too, but if someone like say, James Carville, writes a ridiculous piece (like the one in which he recommends that Dems just sit back and watch the GOP implode) that gets people in many other places talking about it, I’ll still go there and read it. But yeah, I suppose that click does constitute unwarranted support.
I have a very smart and goodhearted friend who says they stay informed by reading it every morning. I’ve tried to recommend other sources, but no, they’re good, and even a bit smug about “staying far more informed than most people are.” < heavy sigh >
10 Likes
This might be a good time to point out that one can read publications like the NYT, WSJ, and WaPo online for free and without logging in via one’s local public library. (Libraries are good at protecting the privacy of their patrons.)
12 Likes
I mean, but also, they’re probably not wrong either.
12 Likes
not sure what this means for us. i get my local news from wplg and regard all the people that present the “news” well. at least locally, there does not seem to be a strong side, left or right, yet not maddeningly “bothsider”…
abc nightly with David Muir is tolerable, but where will our local get their national newsfeed? CNN? i won’t watch that. Sinclair? dog help me, that will be tooo much.
i won’t miss the abc/disney/espn programming that mandates a sportsball match preempt the news, as if sportsball was more important than the multiple destructions to the country and world.
i have no idea where this goes, or why, but the timing is sus…
14 Likes
Ah fuck. You’re right. Dammit.
11 Likes
Meanwhile, there’s this guy:
I know it’s preaching to the choir, but surprisingly succinct and plainly spoken.
14 Likes
Right? I think it might instead be because they’re crying alone more than ever.
11 Likes
The solution to American Unhappyness is clearly to annex Finland instead of Canada or Greenland.
13 Likes
11 Likes
I’m from Chicago so I’m already used to cold, dark winters. Could Finland annex us instead?
14 Likes
Even in that article, they can’t stop themselves from hedging:
I understood that the only dispute was whether Humphrey’s Executor was valid law
No, actually, that is not in dispute. Humphrey’s Executor is absolutely valid law. It has never been overturned. Now, will the current SCOTUS uphold it if and when a case reaches them? I don’t know. Neither does the author. But right now, Humphrey’s Executor is absolutely still valid law.
12 Likes