I peeked, so yeah.
Problem: all my shirts seem to have shrunk in the cylindrical direction–even new ones of my favorite make. I have designed a possible solution (and hope to get a patent): The Cylindrical Sartorial Shrinkage Patch, a triangle of cloth with buttons on the left side and buttonholes on the right. Or possibly vice-versa.
It is possible I’ve gotten the placement upside-down, as I was drawing this in front of a mirror.
Women have had that for some time, but I don’t know if it’s used currently, used to cover up any possible cleavage. I have no idea what the name of it is, but it’s similar to a dickey, which is a false collar-insert. Or like a temporary gusset.
P.S.: One term I’ve found is “modesty panel”.
I imagine that would work on a bulging belly shrinking shirt.
http://www.startribune.com/elizabeth-warren-meets-her-lookalike-at-minnesota-rally/556478171/?fbclid=IwAR3ilGJjH_sxvsZGP-XalfJ75dNHqUQoKtJdPWN-vdH5w9YzMOQ7rhefxOA
It really is a remarkable resemblance.
I thought it might be a placket, and indeed that is one definition, although not the most common. Another word for it is stomacher, but the term is probably hopelessly archaic now.
Yes, I’m familiar with the term “placket”; “stomacher” makes me think of William Howard Taft, for some reason.
I haven’t listened yet, but LeVar Burton plus Shoggoths has got to be worth a few grins.
Could you explain what this is?
One of those purely optional traffic signs they sometimes put at intersections for some inconceivable reason?
I assumed it was a play on the urban legend of the Chevy Nova failing in Spanish countries because “no va” translated to “doesn’t go”. I could be wrong, though.
That’s how I interpreted it. But . . . but . . . it’s not true?
The “purely optional”, or the “doesn’t go”?
(edit: I suppose I wasn’t clear… for the pedants out there, it’s the ones with the white borders that are optional. no, I’m just joking/being sarcastic, don’t do it!)