I think, if I may say so, you are being oversensitive. Eugenics is a discredited pseudo-science from around a hundred years ago and I really don’t think that in 2017 anybody takes the word other than to be how the OED defines it - an informal description of a stupid person. As a matter of fact I had no idea of the connection to eugenics - I assumed it was simply a derivation of the Gk. moros - foolish. The OED does not suggest that it is in any way an improper word.
I’m usually the first person to be correct about language and especially to tell people who are not professionally qualified to stop using psychiatric terminology for people who haven’t been diagnosed, and where they don’t understand the term anyway. But I think this one is a dead letter. Would you prefer “idiot” which means almost exactly the same but is more classist in Greek?
You can refer this one to the moderators if you like.
I’m routinely beaten and/or endangered. And until abled people start respecting disabled people, considering our various accessibility needs, and considering our various safety needs, I’m still going to be routinely beaten and endangered, I’m probably going to be hit again by a car again, and I’m likely to be killed. But right now I can’t even find studies asking about how atypical sensory processing affects safety needs.
If your survival depended on other people changing their attitudes and their safety standards, you’d be hyper-sensitive to their attitudes and their preferred insults.
And even if you’re unaware of that “m****,” “i******,” and “i****,” were classifications in forced sterilization campaigns, you can’t really avoid that they are insults against intellectually and/or neurologically-disabled people.
Let me assure you, a lot of people don’t consider mine. If I got uptight about “ablist language” I could point to so many adverse examples of the use of the word “deaf” I could probably write a (long and tedious) book. But I’m not going to. Literally the only benefit of my condition is I get out of jury service. The disadvantages affect me every day. Except when responding to posts like yours, I choose not to let it get to me.
I’ve just deleted a whole lot of stuff I wrote about this because it was degenerating into a rant, but I’m just going to say that your attempt to find a way to blame someone you considered to be fully able isn’t appreciated. You’re just doubling down on your attempt to turn this into a debate about forced sterilisation, because you can’t answer my point that the meaning of a word has changed.
You are running the risk that, for instance, it will be impossible to express any negative opinion of Trump, Boris Johnson or Erdogan because to do so might imply a mental deficiency. Taken to the extreme, we should never describe someone as being unfit for office because that would indicate a lack of capacity.
I’m not trying to blame you. I’m trying to get rid of the slurs, and get rid of the attitudes that endanger us both.
I’m in bad shape, with a nasty migraine, after getting hit by more @#$%^ turn signals. @#$% turn signals. Can people stop using dangerous weapons and calling them safety signals?
I don’t want anyone to die. I doubt that these weapons protect more people than they kill. I’ve looked for studies-- without success-- there are some studies of flash/strobe/flicker hazards on helicopters, but hardly anything else.
Since I can’t really conceive of how flashing lights could be anything but blinding and disorienting, it’s possible that most people don’t immediately conceive of how flashing lights could be blinding or disorienting, and that there haven’t been any studies of how dangerous they are to how many people.
Sorta like “how could a safety test kill 3 astronauts?” except that the victims are hidden among the 5,376 pedestrian crash victims per year, so the problem is invisible.
Also… can you not reduce my not wanting anyone with neurological issues to get hit by cars to “in order for you to be more comfortable.” Getting hit by a car was more than uncomfortable.
I wonder if the change from filament bulbs to LEDs in flashers on cars has made it worse? I’ve noticed that LEDs go on and off abruptly, while traditional bulbs sort of ramp up from off to on and vice versa – over a short period of time of course. But the difference is sufficient that I’ve noticed it. It’s kind of annoying, but it doesn’t cause the problems you seem to have.
So has it gotten worse for you because of that?
I don’t know how society could change that, though. I’ve never been really susceptible to flickering lights despite my seizure disorder (maybe because meds have stopped them), but I know some people with seizures are. Flickering lights in restaurants really annoy me though, but just because they’re very distracting.
Those high beams are useful when I’m on a country road in Ohio late at night and there’s nobody around except all the fucking deer that are everywhere. I will use my high beams then, and only then.
Talking of fearbeasts, you don’t want to get too close to an elk, even in a car.
if you could legally pass a car directly in front of you, meaning:
not with oncoming traffic,
not on curves, and
not near the crest of a hill.
then you may use your high beams.
That seems to be sufficient precaution to keep them out of other people’s eyes. However, I’ve experienced many examples of people who don’t follow the same rule set.
German makers have some very annoying strobing turn signals - not stop signals. Audi is the worst; I guess they have to do something to justify putting a £5000 badge on a VW. I am surprised they are allowed. But possibly the most annoying things of all to me are the flashing lights people use on bicycles. I am not even sure they are legal here, but May has cut our police so much that these days criminals are relied on to turn themselves in.
Filament bulbs are bad for a whole lot of reasons but it is perfectly possible to make LED bulbs follow the attack/decay curve of filaments - most of my LED bulb controllers do this. I guess at some point car makers will stop trying to market LED bulbs as a “look at me” feature.
Some of the new taillights just look ridiculous. I guess the designers have to obey non-designers at the top. “Make it look distinctive! It’s branding! No, more cowbell! More!”
Section 508 isn’t really enough. It considers tty/relay services an accessible alternative to phones, but by law they require registration, which requires people to be able to use a phone and to prove we can’t use one for certain specified reasons.
Ah, 508. I needed to buy (that is, license) a commercial computer simulation package for research when I worked for th US govt. I had to go through hoops to get around the 508 requirements for software bought by employees. The available codes just don’t adhere to them. I was going to be the only user, and I don’t have any problems with vision that aren’t correctable.
Besides, I really can’t understand how someone with really poor vision (like I used to be without glasses & before my lens implants) could use such a program. It required CAD to make a 3D model, and advanced visualization graphics to interpret the results. Am I missing something? Are there alternatives to CAD and typical scientific visualization for people with vision problems? If so it would be amazing but I just don’t know of any.
I looked at braille displays and keyboards, out of curiosity. They’re crazy expensive (like $10,000 for a display that can handle 80 characters of text) and seem to be still using 80s-era technology. Voice recognition and speech synthesis have come a long way, but in terms of graphics…
With VR and AR and haptic-feedback and touchscreens and computerized image recognition and all, our technology sounds so advanced that it seems like there would be something that could make things usable without sight, but I get the feeling that there isn’t. We’ll probably have self-driving cars long before a computer can describe an image, let alone video.
I’m annoyed at myself because in the last few days I have managed to make three posts with, respectively, typos, a misquote and factually incorrect information (not here).
When you reach my age there’s a constant worry that your mind is losing the plot, and I’ve had it now for several days.
I try to console myself by thinking I’ve already outlived many of my childhood heroes such as Alan Turing, but the disadvantage of being in your late 60s is that a part of you still feels about 20.
Shit, I’m now older than T S Eliot was when he wrote Four Quartets, which was in a way his farewell to the world in case he was killed in the Blitz. And although I could afford a 911, I’m certainly not safe to drive one.
I still just about trust me with the vote, but I’m now firmly convinced that nobody over 65 should be allowed to vote on matters that will have long term effects.
I have this little apartment freezer that people often mistake for a bar fridge. It is very handy and works great except for one design flaw: it’s easy to think the door is shut and sealed when it really isn’t.
Last night I got bread from the freezer and shut (I thought) the door. I have got into the habit of double-checking it.
Today I went to get some frozen chicken breasts out for dinner only to discover it hasn’t quite closed.
I had to toss two unopened boxes of chicken breasts, plus move four jars of homemade peach jam to the fridge because they’d thawed. Everything else seemed all right; even the chicken was only thawed in places.
Not really asking for solutions, just needed to vent 'cos I hate wasting food.
