Well this is interesting

I don’t get any pop-ups or animation on that site, so I don’t know what you’re seeing.

I’ve got the standard add-ons, uBlock Origin plus Privacy Badger, if that helps.

3 Likes
3 Likes

That’s… that’s fantastic! Someone needs to ask Alex Jones why he’s not reporting on this!

2 Likes

WTaF?

6 Likes

This bitch knows how to twitter. I have tried to use the medium and I just do not get it. I am jealous. Also, who knew square dancing was a racist conspiracy?

6 Likes

This hits me where it hurts. I used to be a C4 dancer (Challenge level 4…the highest level in Modern Western Square Dancing), and until reaching C2 (or maybe C3A?) my home caller/instructor was a black woman. Challenge-level dancing is mostly university types – students and professors – plus teachers and computer science geeks. I am horrified to learn there was this whole ulterior motive in its inception.

And no, I have never worn crinoline in my life.

10 Likes

I never knew challenge square dance was a thing. TIL.

6 Likes

Don’t look into that too closely it’ll suck in.

4 Likes

It’s actually a blast: fun physical exercise, to music, with people who by definition are all at genius IQ level.

I had to stop when my brain fried due to an auto-immune disorder (thanks to having kids) and I couldn’t remember the calls consistently any more. Also, at that level, getting any floor time meant driving 1-1.5 hours each way, getting back very late at night, with young children at home. It just didn’t work with my life anymore.

8 Likes

I don’t twitter but that whole thread was good.

I would be careful. Big Square Dance is seeing this. You could be
getting too close. They’ve made people do-si-do with the fishes before.

anyway, the American national dance is obviously breakin’ :woman_cartwheeling:

10 Likes

Me neither. It sounds like time-speed-distance auto rallies for fitter and less adventurous people.

4 Likes

Or like speed chess.

4 Likes

Earlier this year, the IMDb got rid of its message boards. Today, I’ve learned that they are continuing to attempt to monetize/hobble the site. They’re gradually getting rid of the reference mode in favor of an image heavy mode seemingly designed for mobile users. They’ve also hidden most of the info about production companies and distributors in the IMDbPro pay section. Grumble, grumble…

Tangentially, guess who I encountered while researching this issue. Anyone remember back in May when the Other Place had an article about this “gentleman” who ran his 18-wheeler into a Nevada Bunny Ranch and one of the understandably upset sex workers logged onto BB to object to the use of the G-word? Well, she’s an IMDb user and has spent a little time on their help forums complaining about the difficulties IMDb presents in updating/accessing their Adult film data.

A quote from Kiteh Kawasaki: “America’s sexual self-loathing is deeply disturbing to me as a Japanese. I grew up at Kanayama Shrine where we worship erect phalluses. That’s my religion. I kid you not.”

She really should have stuck around.

8 Likes

I hadn’t noticed the image-heavy mobile-style change yet, but I just use google to search it for info and reviews about specific movies/shows. As for the message boards, without moderation they seemed about on par with Youtube comments.

4 Likes

The mobile-style change has been around since 2010. If you were a registered user, you could adjust your settings and retain the old reference mode. You can still do that for movies (for a little while at least), but you can’t do it for people anymore.

I rarely used the message boards, and when I did it was almost always for non-mainstream titles which didn’t seem to attract trolls. Perhaps, considered as a whole, the message boards did deserve to go, but I feel rather certain this had to do with the bottom line rather than concerns about content.

1 Like
1 Like

I didn’t use the message boards on IMDB much at all, but they were fun for discussing/heckling movies (I remember having fun trashing Highlander: the Source there.) I’m kinda sad they’re gone… but I rarely used them.

I don’t think the changes on IMDB have made it more mobile-friendly. I find it harder to get the information I want. Too many hoops to jump through, to the point where I’ve used Wikipedia instead. It’s a real shame.

5 Likes

I almost never use the internet on my mobile, so I was just going off what others had said. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

3 Likes

I usually try to Google precisely enough that I’ll hit the page I want, or at least be just one or two clicks away. I don’t use IMDB’s own navigation much.

4 Likes

Interesting. I always thought they were an - admittedly unusually elaborate - video-centric “theme” for Amazon and not required to make any money otherwise.

2 Likes