When I remodeled my kitchen I sketched the cabinet positions on the wall. I also drew the fridge with food, and the oven with a turkey in it.
Thatās a great approach!
In my woodworking I often end up with cubic offcuts. I had a bunch of them and turned them into dice:
These are ~3/4ā cubes. Iām working on a big one from madrone thatās 1.5ā cube.
For your beautiful beetle drawings I would suggest Bristol Board (and a good fixative).
Yep, I recognise that feeling.
Thanks! Iāve seen Bristol Board recommended elsewhere, and a fixative is a good suggestion; I have noticed that the pigment brushes off easily.
I need to work out my rustiness doing some drawing on lower stakes paper. And as for watercolour, I bought a cheaper, but still 100% cotton paper that I designated as my learning paper, that I do lessons and practice on. The Saunders Waterford, etc. will be for when I feel more confident.
Now do a 20-sided die!!!
Iāll take a mimic
been working on a D20 and a D10 for DB.
mum is going with poured polyster resin and i an trying cast aluminum or pewter. will mark them in the laser engraver.
will they ever be true? we shall see!
Wow, thatās awesome!
Sadly, I donāt know how Iād do the numbers, much less get the facets right. Square I can do. Repeating exact crazy angles is not in my skill- or toolset. And I donāt have a laser engraver or CNC to do the numbers. I start topping out even trying to fit six dots on a 3/4ā surface!
Iām not suggesting this is actually something to try, but that made me wonder how someone would make that shape. Itās not possible to slice off a plane just given three points that should be on it, is it? Because then you could start with a cube, mark two points on each side, and then cut it down.
Easy in theory. I agree with @DukeTrout, no clue how I would even begin to do that in my home shop!
Even the jigs to hold such a thing for cutting would be works of art!
@OWYAC I saw a good tip recently for watercolor, but imagine it applies to pencils, too. Do your color swatches and blends on the paper you intend to use. You end up with a sort of recipe book for your colors, since they show differently on the different media. Itās been getting me over the hurdle of daring to draw on all that pretty paper.
Eta: here are a couple samples I did the other night, learning to work with triads.
Well, it doesnāt strictly have to be single cuts. I am guessing it could at least be done by whittling or sanding each of the eight corners down to the appropriate planesā¦that seems like it would take an exceptionally long time though. The sort of thing that you want to save for enchanted wood.
That was the first thing I did with my watercolours!
One way to do it IRL with a solid block of wood
Another method is to make it hollow and focus on making each facet separately and gluing it all together
Probably the same way that people make dice from crystals and gems - with a precision angle armature and a rotational sander/polisher. There are some amazing artists who make these works of art.
I donāt know of such tools for wood. If one is working on the same scale as the crystal dice, then I would expect the same tools would work. Working at a larger scale would probably require bigger tools.
ETA: Thank you for that link, @Grey_Devil! Still looks very difficult, because as you cut, youāre losing your reference faces. One trick I learned from Cam at Blacktail Studios is to glue your reference surface cut-offs back onto the piece with something firm but removable, like CA glue. Then you can still measure and cut from your reference faces as you go. Youāre basically re-assembling your original piece as you go, then removing everything at the end.
I think it would be possible to do it as described but yeah putting back some of the cut faces might help make it less confusing.
I think I would try cutting 20 tetrahedrons (not regular, outward facing facet different from the others) and gluing them together, similar to making each facet separately but not hollow. I think this could be done by ripping one of the angles on a table saw, and the other two on a cutoff saw, at the same angle alternating the direction.
I did this rhombic dodecahedron and these tetrahedrons with this method successfully. Both only require one angled rip and a single compound (dodecahedron) or non-compound (tetrahedrons) angle on a cutoff saw.
The only thing with that is that you have to get the angle exactly right or there will be gaps. I was thinking that lengths might be easier to measure than angles. And incidentally to calculate ā the distance between the points on the cube is the side length divided by the golden ratio.