If only we could know what the difference was, that caused such discrepancy in their sentencing.
Which difference are you referring to?
That the one person committed a crime against the wealthy and the other against (presumably) nobody with enough money to pressure the judge to impose consequences?
That the victim in the latter case was probably a man and the victims in the other were women?
That one perpetrator is a cop “school resource officer”, and the other has to actually face prosecution by someone who wants to convict?
Or just the racial thing?
That’s a pretty darned good list!
What? That is a little child.
Thread, about ten solutions presented.
Presentation begins at 19:30:
And Joshua Brown, who testified in the Amber Guyger case, has been gunned down.
So the Dallas police have 3 suspects for the Joshua Brown completely coincidental murder. No reason to suspect that they’re scapegoats for a retaliatory assassination.
Yes, after driving four hours to buy weed from someone who (to my knowledge) has never sold drugs.
Really takes on the whole “Sprinkle some crack on them” vibe
showing up at the family with fifteen police cars to arrest a family of five.
Fucking what?
Obviously the police force for that township is too large and needs to be reduced.
…to zero, with a fresh crop of (hopefully) more professional ones hired to replace them.
“Social worker with a gun” or a renewal of an old idea?