Maybe another thread would be appropriate, but not sure what to call it:
Well, gee. Thanks.
āWeāre not a racist group,ā Sessions said.
āWe just have a lot of deep-seated racism embedded in our history, which weāre here to celebrate,ā he didnāt continue.
Cornyn approvingly citing Mussolini:
Wut?
Is he holding up Mussolini as a defender of personal freedom?
He could possibly be going for the āMussolini was a socialistā bullshit. Hard to tell.
What the hell are āforms?ā Red tape? Complexity of social or institutional structures? If we wanted to reduce complexity, Iād vote for getting rid of shell companies, loopholes in taxes that let the rich pay no taxes, financial āinstrumentsā that serve no purpose but to enrich the already rich, etc.
With a side order of āall forms of socialism are the sameā.
BTW, on the topic of āMussolini the Socialistā:
Converts are always among the worst of the fundamentalists.
Shitty babies with shitty opinions.
At the point where you admit that your version of Christianity is against social justice, you might not actually be a Christian:
This is something Iāve wondered. If youāre not a social justice warrior, then what are you?
Very un-Christ-like, thatās for sure.
Obligatory:
But yeah, they say it like being a social justice warrior would be a bad thing-- and it isnāt.
This is so obvious to anyone who knows anything about Christ; was to me, and I havenāt looked in a Bible in maybe five decades.
Social Justice Wizard, Social Justice Cleric, Social Justice Rogue, Social Justice Ranger, Social Justice Assassin, Social Justice Character in a Skill-Based System, ā¦
Either a social injustice warrior or a useful fool, Iād imagine.
Suggested alignments: Neutral or Chaotic Good. Lawful and Neutral or Evil are allowable so long as the player roleplays a middle aged failure whoās found themself in the Brown Gay Bar part of town.