Haven’t white nationalists done that already?
You can still go Lawful; it can indicate adherence to a personal code rather than a codified legal system.
Social Justice Bard. +3 when streaming.
Wow what a surprise. The TGOP trying to cheat and lie to keep power.
I know, right? It’s so out of character.
Of course this is an old evil. But still:
If liberals won’t hurt people to defend white supremacy, fascists will! well, that’s what fascists try to do regardless, and it’s what absolutely no one should ever do.
The Atlantic was already in bed with the New Fascism long ago. I mean, hell, they employed Jonathan “Appropriation Prize” Kay.
They’re not even smart enough to be in bed with them. They still think this is all an intellectual exercise.
Trump wants a nationwide “work requirements” death panel to cut disabled people off Medicaid, and state-by-state death panels to cut costs:
And further cuts to those who are disabled in the right ways to qualify for ssdi and abled enough to get through the bureaucracy:
I can’t find any estimates of the human costs, yet.
Thread:
Second story thread has been posted:
Radley Balko’s response here:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/13/immigration-opponents-any-old-argument-will-do/
The thing to remember here is the only consistent principle behind immigration restrictionism is opposition to immigrants. As a nativist, you’re free to argue that immigrants are both lazy and hardworking. They’re both assimilating too quickly and refusing to assimilate. They’re both violent drug pushers who are crowding our prisons, and they’re teetotaling law-abiders whose good citizenship is unfairly diverting attention from overdose deaths and mass incarceration among the native-born. Pick and chose these points as you need them. Any old argument will do.
It’s the NYTimes, and I’ve heard a rumor that incognito doesn’t work as well as it used to for them, but worth reading if you can:
The Adblock Browser works well at the moment. Firefox not so much. (iOS)
[takes a guess based on the headline]
[checks article]
Yup. Not to mention milk fits nicely with the whole “purity” concept.
Irked by this part:
Instead of long-discounted proxies like skull circumference and family pedigrees
I don’t think the early 90s counts as “long-discounted”. That’s when a psychologist at my university used skull circumference to claim Asians were superior to whites, who were in turn superior to black people.
He got to keep his job.