I haven’t been saying anything about this issue, because I am not very good at it. But I would be unhappy to see you leave, so if we’re hitting that point, I feel I owe it to at least try and offer some comment first.
The difficulty is that at least in form, I don’t think anyone has done anything so wrong here. This includes making the initial remark. xkxvi has explained her thought process, but it lines up with what I would have guessed – it was meant as a sleeping with the enemy kind of joke and not intended as anything against gay people.
The thing is that our words are always contextualized by the broader world. It’s not just a matter of inserting one’s biases into it, but in seeing how it ends up interacting with biases. I’ve heard puns and jokes that only in retrospect are making fun of black people’s speech and names. There are enough sketches that seem funny on their own but taken together are plainly promoting some stereotype. It’s like how there’s nothing wrong with the black guy dying in an action movie, until it turns out the black guy always dies in action movies.
Such problems can be really easy to trip over, and I think it is reasonable to say that happened here. There are lots of Trump/Putin sex jokes out there from both America and Russia, and when you look at them as a whole, they do reflect their widespread homophobia. They quickly become not just about the two being inappropriate close, but tinged with the idea that it is shameful for one man to sexually submit to another. So I think it is reasonable to consider that even an adjacent joke might add to homophobia, as a different question from whether that was its intent.
I agree such a call out could definitely be done via PM, but honestly that wouldn’t have occurred to me. Precisely because it’s not really a personal concern about the poster, but a public concern about how such comments are contextualized. It happens fairly easily, and I don’t think it reflects badly on anyone who tries to do better. And here there was a straightforward apology for the misstep, which I imagined would settle it, with no hard feelings or opprobrium.
Except maybe something like it happens needed to have been said, because plainly there are hard feelings and kxkvi feels opprobrium has unfairly been attached. Looking back I can see how what I’d thought of as impersonal discussion would as easily be thought of as personal faulting by someone involved, which is unfortunate because the second isn’t appropriate. And that, too, is an easy misstep to make – one I expect I’ve done a lot without knowing – especially in text. You can have everyone be entirely well-meaning and still have people feel ill-treated.
I wish I had an idea of how to better avoid that. But again, I’m not very good with this kind of thing. So I just wanted to say to everyone involved that I understand where you were coming from, and I’m very sorry it worked out to anyone here being hurt.